ZAFARMAND V POMPEO (CAND #3:20-cv-00803-MMC)

image63

ABOUT THE CASE

In Zafarmand v. Pompeo, 3 Iranian American families challenge the U.S. Government’s unreasonable administrative delays in adjudicating 9 travel ban waivers. Challenged policies include the U.S. Government’s usurpation of individual consular officers authority and discretion to adjudicate travel ban waivers, and the designation of that authority and discretion to non-consular officers, including consular managers, visa chiefs, consular section chiefs, consular management the Visa Office, and Quality Support, Inc. contractors, which is unlawful under Presidential Proclamation 9645, §3(C) ("PP 9645"). 


Plaintiffs in this action include U.S. citizens, their families, and their Iranian national immediate relatives  who have been denied timely adjudication of case-by-case PP 9645 waivers. 


Upcoming hearings:


What: Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

When: May 1, 2020, 9:00 am

Where:  San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom 7, 19th Floor, 

450 Golden Gate Avenue,  San Francisco, CA 94102 

Before: JUDGE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 


The Iranian American families or couples are represented by Curtis Lee Morrison through:

The Law Office of Rafael Ureña

925 N La Brea Ave, 4th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90038

ru@urenaesq.com

(917) 204-0670

For a free consult, reach Curtis Morrison:

email: curtis@curtismorrisonlaw.com

whatsapp/telegram: @curtisatlaw or +1 714-661-3446. 

IN THE NEWS