DV2021 not part of a lawsuit??

Law Office of curtis morrison
Law Office of curtis morrison
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Jacob v Trump
  • Rai v Biden
  • Contact us
  • DV
  • Young v Trump
  • MANDAMUS
  • RAZI V. POMPEO
  • MALEK V POMPEO
  • ZAFARMAND V POMPEO
  • KAYVAN V POMPEO
  • POOZESH V POMPEO
  • NAJAFI V. POMPEO
  • JAMAL V. POMPEO
  • DARCHINI V. POMPEO
  • MOSLEH V. POMPEO
  • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS
  • Helpful Videos
  • More
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Jacob v Trump
    • Rai v Biden
    • Contact us
    • DV
    • Young v Trump
    • MANDAMUS
    • RAZI V. POMPEO
    • MALEK V POMPEO
    • ZAFARMAND V POMPEO
    • KAYVAN V POMPEO
    • POOZESH V POMPEO
    • NAJAFI V. POMPEO
    • JAMAL V. POMPEO
    • DARCHINI V. POMPEO
    • MOSLEH V. POMPEO
    • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS
    • Helpful Videos

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Jacob v Trump
  • Rai v Biden
  • Contact us
  • DV
  • Young v Trump
  • MANDAMUS
  • RAZI V. POMPEO
  • MALEK V POMPEO
  • ZAFARMAND V POMPEO
  • KAYVAN V POMPEO
  • POOZESH V POMPEO
  • NAJAFI V. POMPEO
  • JAMAL V. POMPEO
  • DARCHINI V. POMPEO
  • MOSLEH V. POMPEO
  • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS
  • Helpful Videos

POOZESH V. POMPEO (CAED CASE # 1:19-cv-01466-ljo-sko)

ABOUT THE CASE

In Poozesh v. Pompeo, now referred to as Motaghedi v. Pompeo,  5* Iranian American families or couples are challenging the U.S. Government’s unreasonable administrative delays in adjudicating 21 travel ban waivers. Challenged policies include the U.S. Government’s designating the authority and discretion to approve case-by-case waivers to individual consular officers to consular managers, visa chiefs, consular section chiefs, consular management and Visa Office, which is unlawful under Presidential Proclamation 9645, §3(C) ("PP 9645"). Plaintiffs also challenge the State Department's arbitrary decision to not use its' new automated vetting process for the visa applicants who have waited the longest.


Plaintiffs in this action are U.S. citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, and their Iranian national relatives or fiancées who were visa applicants that have been denied timely adjudication of case-by-case PP 9645 waivers. As of Oct. 15, 2019, the average visa beneficiary in this case has waited 500 days for a waiver, and 5 have waited 677 days for a waiver, since the day PP 9645 went into effect. 


*Originally 11 families/couples filed the case, and 6 dismissed their claims upon issuances of visas on Dec. 15, 2019, and Jan. 1, 2020, or are about to do so.



The Iranian American families or couples are represented by Curtis Lee Morrison through:

The Law Office of Rafael Ureña

925 N La Brea Ave, 4th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90038

ru@urenaesq.com

(917) 204-0670

For a free consult, reach Curtis Morrison:

email: curtis@curtismorrisonlaw.com

whatsapp/telegram: @curtisatlaw or +1 714-661-3446. 

COURT ORDERS AND IMPORTANT FILINGS

MARCH 30, 2021 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT


MARCH 5, 2021 JOINT STATUS REPORT 


FEBRUARY 18 , 2021 ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE


FEBRUARY 17, 2021 JOINT STATUS REPORT


JANUARY 29, 2021 JOINT STATUS REPORT


JANUARY 25, 2021  ORDER REQUIRING STATUS REPORT 


JANUARY 19, 2021 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE


DECEMBER 21, 2020  MINUTE ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 

FOR MAY 13, 2021


DECEMBER 17, 2020   JOINT STIPULATION RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATES 


NOVEMBER 17, 2020   STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE 


NOVEMBER 16, 2020 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES


NOVEMBER 2 2020 MINUTE ORDER TO HOLD PLAINTIFFS’ PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL IN ABEYANCE UNTIL DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STAY IS RESOLVED  


OCTOBER 27, 2020 PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL


OCTOBER 21, 2020 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY


OCTOBER 5, 2020  NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FULL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS 


SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR STAY


SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 NOTICE OF FILING OF CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD


SEPTEMBER 2, 2020 ORDER COMPELLING DEFENDANT TO COMPLY WITH SCHEDULING

ORDER, VACATING HEARING, AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL


AUGUST  28, 2020 PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL


AUGUST 26, 2020  OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL


AUGUST 10, 2020  NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FULL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS


AUGUST 10, 2020   GOVERNMENT'S  SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STAY

JUNE 22, 2020 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT


APRIL 17, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE


APRIL 10, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE


MAR. 17, 2020 MINUTE ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE


MAR. 16, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE UNDER FRCP 12(f)


MAR. 2, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S ANSWER


FEB. 7, 2020  ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO TAKE SEVERAL PLAINTIFFS  OFF THE CASE WHO VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED CLAIMS


FEB. 5, 2020 CLAIMS DISMISSED FOR FOUR MORE PLAINTIFF FAMILIES WHO GOT THEIR VISAS


JAN. 31, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF INTENT NOT TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT


JAN. 30, 2020 ORDER RE THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS


JAN. 27, 2020 (SEALED) ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL


JAN. 24, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY


JAN. 22, 2020 JOINT STATEMENT RE; DISCOVERY DISAGREEMENT


JAN. 21, 2020 ORDER VACATING JAN. 28 HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS


JAN. 17, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS


JAN. 17, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S  RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY


JAN. 10, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS


JAN. 8, 2020 (UNSEALED) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


JAN. 7, 2020 MINUTE ORDER RESCHEDULING RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE


JAN. 6, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLETE RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' INTERROGATORIES 


JAN. 2, 2020 ORDER  VACATING JAN. 10, 2020 HEARING


JAN. 1, 2019 CLAIMS DISMISSED FOR DEPARTED PLAINTIFF, AND ONE MORE COUPLE 


DEC. 18, 2019 ONE MORE COUPLE DISMISSES THEIR CLAIMS


DEC. 16, 2019 GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS


DEC 15, 2019 THREE COUPLES DISMISS THEIR CLAIMS AFTER ISSUANCES OF VISAS


NOV. 21, 2019 ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


NOV. 20, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


NOV. 15, 2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYMS


NOV. 14, 2019 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEVER AND TRANSFER IN PART (UNSEALED 12/10/2019) 


NOV. 13, 2019 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION

TO SEVER, AND MOTION TO TRANSFER IN PART


NOV. 11, 2019 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEVER AND MOTION TO TRANSFER IN PART; PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


NOV. 7, 2019 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SEVER; MOTION TO TRANSFER IN PART; OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


OCT. 29, 2019 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATION OF ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY AUDREY B. HEMESATH AS COUNSEL


OCT. 26, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


OCT. 25, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT


OCT. 15, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 





IN THE NEWS

NOV. 9, 2019 San Francisco Chronicle: Iranian families separated by Trump travel ban sue over waiver delays



This website is for informational purposes only. Using this site or communicating with Law Office of Curtis Morrison through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.  This site is legal advertising.


  • DV
  • Young v Trump
  • MANDAMUS
  • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS