In Najafi v. Pompeo, Iranian American families are challenging the U.S. Government’s designation of the authority and discretion to approve case-by-case waivers to individual consular officers to consular managers, visa chiefs, consular section chiefs, consular management, the Visa Office, and Quality Support, Inc. contractors, which is unlawful under Presidential Proclamation 9645, §3(C) ("PP 9645").
Plaintiffs in this action are U.S. citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, and their Iranian national immediate relatives who are immigrant visa applicants that have been denied timely adjudication of case-by-case PP 9645 waivers as a result of the State Department's usurpation of consular officer authority and discretion.
The Iranian American families are represented by Curtis Lee Morrison through:
The Law Office of Rafael Ureña
925 N La Brea Ave, 4th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90038
For a free consult, reach Curtis Morrison:
whatsapp/telegram: @curtisatlaw or +1 714-661-3446
JAN. 7, 2020 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE, ARGUING distress over what will happen to family members in Iran given recent U.S. military action – does not justify dispensing with the judicial efficiencies that would come with deferring a Rule 26(f) conference until after resolution of the motion to dismiss."
OCT. 11, 2019 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION, RESCHEDULING HEARING FOR DEC. 5, 2019, AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY