NAJAFI V. POMPEO (CAND CASE # 3:19-cv-05782)

image1

ABOUT THE CASE

In Najafi v. Pompeo, 20 Iranian American families are challenging the U.S. Government’s unreasonable administrative delays in adjudicating 24 waivers under the travel ban. Challenged policies include the U.S. Government’s designating the authority and discretion to approve case-by-case waivers to individual consular officers to consular managers, visa chiefs, consular section chiefs, consular management and Visa Office, which is unlawful under Presidential Proclamation 9645, §3(C) ("PP 9645"). Plaintiffs in this action are U.S. citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, and their Iranian national relatives or fiancées who were visa applicants that have been denied timely adjudication of case-by-case PP 9645 waivers. As of Sept. 15, 2019, the average visa beneficiary in this case has waited 501 days for a waiver, and 5 have waited 647 days for a waiver, since the day PP 9645 went into effect. 


UPCOMING HEARING

What: Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore

When: December 5, 2019, at 1:30 pm 

Where: United States Courthouse for the Northern District of California 

Oakland Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612


The twenty Iranian American families are represented by Curtis Lee Morrison through:


The Law Office of Rafael Ureña

925 N La Brea Ave, 4th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90038

ru@urenaesq.com

(917) 204-0670


For a free consult, reach Curtis Morrison:

email: curtis@curtismorrisonlaw.com

whatsapp/telegram: @curtisatlaw or +1 714-661-3446. 

COURT ORDERS AND IMPORTANT FILINGS

NOV. 14, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


NOV. 13, 2019 FAMILIES/COUPLES FOR FIVE VISAS THAT HAVE BEEN ISSUED DISMISS THEIR CLAIMS


NOV. 9, 2019 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY EX PARTE APPLICATION TO MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES


NOV. 9, 2019  PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY EX PARTE APPLICATION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES 


NOV. 8, 2019 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


OCT. 23, 2019 ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


OCT. 18, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO GOVT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


OCT. 17, 2019 GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


OCT. 11, 2019 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION, RESCHEDULING HEARING FOR DEC. 5, 2019, AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


OCT. 10, 2019 DEFENDANTS CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE


OCT. 10, 2019 ALL PARTIES STIPULATE TO BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION.


OCT. 8, 2019 KENNETH W. BRAKEBILL, ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, ENTERS APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS


OCT. 2, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 


SEPT. 30, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' RE-NOTICE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING (ADJUSTING HEARING DATE TO NOV. 7, 2019)


SEPT. 26, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MEMO IN SUPPORT


SEPT. 26, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S AUTHORITY


SEPT. 16, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE.


SEPT. 15, 2019, COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS.