DARCHINI V. POMPEO (CACD CASE # 8:19-cv-01417-JVS-DFM)

image93

ABOUT THE CASE

 In Darchini v. Pompeo, 14 Iranian American families are challenging the U.S. Government’s unreasonable administrative delays in adjudicating case-by-case waivers of under the travel ban. Challenged policies include the U.S. Government’s designating the authority and discretion to approve case-by-case waivers to individual consular officers to consular managers, visa chiefs, consular section chiefs, consular management and Visa Office, which is unlawful under Presidential Proclamation 9645, §3(C) ("PP 9645"). Plaintiffs in this action are U.S. citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, and their Iranian national relatives or fiancées who were visa applicants that had been denied timely adjudication of case-by-case PP 9645 waivers. Some families have waited in excess of 600 days. 


What: Hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction

When: September 16, 2019, at 1:30 pm 

Where: United States Courthouse for the Central District of California 

Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse 

411 West 4th Street, Courtroom 10C 

Santa Ana, California 92701


The fourteen Iranian American families are represented by Curtis Lee Morrison through:

The Law Office of Rafael Ureña

925 N La Brea Ave, 4th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90038

ru@urenaesq.com

(703) 989-4424


For a free consult, reach Curtis Morrison via email: curtis@curtismorrisonlaw.com / (telegram: 714-661-3446). 

COURT ORDERS AND IMPORTANT FILINGS

SEPT. 13, 2019, DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 


SEPT. 13, 2019, PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS' AUTOMATED PRE-VETTING HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED EXHIBIT A: EMAIL


SEPT 9, 2019 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 11


SEPT. 6, 2019 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS CORRECT PRIOR MISREPRESENTATION, & BRAG ABOUT ISSUING  VISAS TO ONLY TWO PLAINTIFFS


AUGUST 30, 2019 JUDGE SELNA CONTINUES (RESCHEDULES) HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TO SEPTEMBER 16, 2019


AUGUST 27, 2019 JUDGE DOUGLAS F. MCCORMICK'S ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


AUGUST 26, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


AUGUST 22, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


AUGUST 16, 2019 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION  


AUGUST 16, 2019 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 


AUGUST 14, 2019 CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL (MEMORIALIZING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED PRODUCTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS 


AUGUST 2, 2019 JOSEPH A. DARROW, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ENTERS HIS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS


JULY 31, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXPEDITED PRODUCTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT


JULY 29, 2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYMS  


JULY 27, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT


JULY 23, 2019 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES


JULY 22, 2019 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS