DARCHINI V. POMPEO (CACD CASE # 8:19-cv-01417-JVS-DFM)
ABOUT THE CASE
In Darchini v. Pompeo (Now known as Kavoosian v Pompeo), 3 (originally 14) Iranian American families are challenging the U.S. Government’s unreasonable administrative delays in adjudicating case-by-case waivers of under the travel ban. Challenged policies include the U.S. Government’s designating the authority and discretion to approve case-by-case waivers to individual consular officers to consular managers, visa chiefs, consular section chiefs, consular management and Visa Office, which is unlawful under Presidential Proclamation 9645, §3(C) ("PP 9645"). Plaintiffs in this action are U.S. citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, and their Iranian national relatives or fiancées who were visa applicants that had been denied timely adjudication of case-by-case PP 9645 waivers.
The three (originally fourteen) Iranian American families are represented by Curtis Lee Morrison through:
The Law Office of Rafael Ureña
925 N La Brea Ave, 4th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90038
(917) 204-0670
For a free consult, reach Curtis Morrison via email: curtis@curtismorrisonlaw.com / (telegram/whatsapp: 714-661-3446).
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
DECEMBER 20, 2020 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT
NOVEMBER 27, 2020 GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
NOVEMBER 18, 2020 CASE BEING CONSIDERED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
NOVEMBER 3 , 2020 APPELLANTS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 25 , 2020 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
AUGUST 18, 2020 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF JULY 29, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S ANSWERING BRIEF TO 9TH CIRCUIT
JULY 29, 2020 ORDER RELEASING CASE FROM MEDIATION PROGRAM
JUNE 29, 2020 APPELLANTS' OPENING BRIEF
District Court for the Northern District of California
MAR. 20, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF APPEAL
MAR. 16, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR HEARING
MAR. 16, 2020 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON GOVERNMENT'S MTD
MAR. 15, 2020 TENTATIVE ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S MTD
MAR 4, 2020 ORDER RESCHEDULING MAR. 9 HEARING TO MAR. 16
FEB. 24, 2020 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION TO FILE FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
FEB. 20, 2020 PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
FEB. 20, 2020 ANOTHER FAMILY DISMISSES CLAIMS AFTER VISA ISSUANCE
FEB. 9, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' THIRD NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
FEB. 6, 2020 HEARING SCHEDULED FOR FEB. 10 RESCHEDULED FOR MAR. 9
JAN. 30 , 2020 PLAINTIFFS' SECOND NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
JAN. 27, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
JAN. 24, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
JAN. 18, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT
JAN. 18, 2020 ONE FAMILY DISMISSES CLAIMS AFTER VISA ISSUANCE
JAN. 14, 2020 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, AND MEMO IN SUPPORT
DEC. 30, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH EXHIBITS
DEC. 10, 2019 ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO REPLEAD THEIR CLAIMS WITHIN 20 DAYS
DEC. 6, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST/APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COURT'S DEC. 3, 2019 ORDER
DEC. 3, 2019 ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
NOV. 29, 2019 PLAINTIFFS ASK COURT TO CONSIDER DECLARATION OF JOEL NANTAIS
NOV. 13, 2019 FAMILIES/COUPLES FOR FOUR VISAS THAT HAVE BEEN ISSUED DISMISS THEIR CLAIMS
NOV. 12, 2019 DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
NOV. 3, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
OCT. 29, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (REVISED 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION NOTICE)
OCT. 23, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
OCT. 15, 2019 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
OCT. 3 , 2019 ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
SEPT. 29, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE MAGISTRATE'S ORDER
SEPT. 27, 2019 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR DEC. 9, 2019
SEPT. 26, 2019 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE MAGISTRATE'S ORDER OF AUGUST 27, 2019
SEPT. 24, 2019 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
SEPT. 13, 2019, DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
SEPT. 13, 2019, PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS' AUTOMATED PRE-VETTING HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED EXHIBIT A: EMAIL
SEPT 9, 2019 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 11
AUGUST 16, 2019 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AUGUST 16, 2019 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
JULY 29, 2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYMS
JULY 27, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
JULY 23, 2019 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES
JULY 22, 2019 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS