DV2021 not part of a lawsuit??

Law Office of curtis morrison
Law Office of curtis morrison
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Jacob v Trump
  • Rai v Biden
  • Contact us
  • DV
  • Young v Trump
  • MANDAMUS
  • RAZI V. POMPEO
  • MALEK V POMPEO
  • ZAFARMAND V POMPEO
  • KAYVAN V POMPEO
  • POOZESH V POMPEO
  • NAJAFI V. POMPEO
  • JAMAL V. POMPEO
  • DARCHINI V. POMPEO
  • MOSLEH V. POMPEO
  • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS
  • Helpful Videos
  • More
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Jacob v Trump
    • Rai v Biden
    • Contact us
    • DV
    • Young v Trump
    • MANDAMUS
    • RAZI V. POMPEO
    • MALEK V POMPEO
    • ZAFARMAND V POMPEO
    • KAYVAN V POMPEO
    • POOZESH V POMPEO
    • NAJAFI V. POMPEO
    • JAMAL V. POMPEO
    • DARCHINI V. POMPEO
    • MOSLEH V. POMPEO
    • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS
    • Helpful Videos

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Jacob v Trump
  • Rai v Biden
  • Contact us
  • DV
  • Young v Trump
  • MANDAMUS
  • RAZI V. POMPEO
  • MALEK V POMPEO
  • ZAFARMAND V POMPEO
  • KAYVAN V POMPEO
  • POOZESH V POMPEO
  • NAJAFI V. POMPEO
  • JAMAL V. POMPEO
  • DARCHINI V. POMPEO
  • MOSLEH V. POMPEO
  • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS
  • Helpful Videos

DARCHINI V. POMPEO (CACD CASE # 8:19-cv-01417-JVS-DFM)

ABOUT THE CASE

 In Darchini v. Pompeo (Now known as Kavoosian v Pompeo), 3 (originally 14) Iranian American families are challenging the U.S. Government’s unreasonable administrative delays in adjudicating case-by-case waivers of under the travel ban. Challenged policies include the U.S. Government’s designating the authority and discretion to approve case-by-case waivers to individual consular officers to consular managers, visa chiefs, consular section chiefs, consular management and Visa Office, which is unlawful under Presidential Proclamation 9645, §3(C) ("PP 9645"). Plaintiffs in this action are U.S. citizens, Legal Permanent Residents, and their Iranian national relatives or fiancées who were visa applicants that had been denied timely adjudication of case-by-case PP 9645 waivers.  


The three (originally fourteen) Iranian American families are represented by Curtis Lee Morrison through:

The Law Office of Rafael Ureña

925 N La Brea Ave, 4th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90038

ru@urenaesq.com

(917) 204-0670


For a free consult, reach Curtis Morrison via email: curtis@curtismorrisonlaw.com / (telegram/whatsapp: 714-661-3446). 

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

APRIL 6, 2021 MANDATE 


FEBRUARY 3, 2021 NOTICE 


FEBRUARY 2, 2021 NOTICE 


DECEMBER 20, 2020 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT 


NOVEMBER 27, 2020  GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY 


NOVEMBER 18, 2020  CASE BEING CONSIDERED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT 


NOVEMBER 3 , 2020   APPELLANTS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

SEPTEMBER 25 , 2020   PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY  


AUGUST 18, 2020 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF JULY 29, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S ANSWERING BRIEF TO 9TH CIRCUIT


JULY 29, 2020 ORDER RELEASING CASE FROM MEDIATION PROGRAM


JUNE 29, 2020 APPELLANTS' OPENING BRIEF


MAR. 27, 2020 NINTH CIRCUIT'S TIME SCHEDULE ORDER

District Court for the Northern District of California

FEBRUARY 9, 2021 ORDER


MAR. 20, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF APPEAL


MAR. 18, 2020 ORDER GRANTING GRANTING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE


MAR. 16, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR HEARING


MAR. 16, 2020 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON GOVERNMENT'S MTD


MAR. 15, 2020 TENTATIVE ORDER ON GOVERNMENT'S MTD


MAR. 12, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR COURT'S PERMISSION TO ENTER LATEST DOS/AILA LIAISON MEETING Q & A'S AS EVIDENCE


MAR 4, 2020 ORDER RESCHEDULING MAR. 9 HEARING TO MAR. 16


FEB. 24, 2020 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION TO FILE FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE


FEB. 20, 2020 PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE


FEB. 20, 2020 ANOTHER FAMILY DISMISSES CLAIMS AFTER VISA ISSUANCE


FEB. 9, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' THIRD NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY


FEB. 6, 2020 HEARING SCHEDULED FOR FEB. 10 RESCHEDULED FOR MAR. 9


JAN. 30 , 2020 PLAINTIFFS' SECOND NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY


JAN. 27, 2020 GOVERNMENT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT


JAN. 24, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY


JAN. 18, 2020 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT


JAN. 18, 2020 ONE FAMILY DISMISSES CLAIMS AFTER VISA ISSUANCE


JAN. 14, 2020 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS'  MOTION  TO DISMISS, AND MEMO IN SUPPORT


DEC. 30, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH  EXHIBITS


DEC. 10, 2019 ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO REPLEAD THEIR CLAIMS WITHIN 20 DAYS


DEC. 6, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST/APPLICATION TO AMEND THE COURT'S DEC. 3, 2019 ORDER


DEC. 3, 2019 ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS


DEC. 2, 2019 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION TO HAVE COURT CONSIDER DECLARATION OF JOEL NANTAIS


NOV. 29, 2019 PLAINTIFFS ASK COURT TO CONSIDER DECLARATION OF JOEL NANTAIS


NOV. 19, 2019 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO SUPPLEMENT EVIDENCE (RE: INTERNET OUTAGES IN IRAN)


NOV. 19, 2019 PLAINTIFFS ASK COURT TO CONSIDER IMPACTS OF PROTESTS, UNREST, AND INTERNET OUTAGES IN IRAN 


NOV. 13, 2019 FAMILIES/COUPLES FOR FOUR VISAS THAT HAVE BEEN ISSUED DISMISS THEIR CLAIMS


NOV. 12, 2019 DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT


NOV. 3, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS


OCT. 29, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (REVISED 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION NOTICE)


OCT. 23, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY


OCT. 15, 2019 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS


OCT. 3 , 2019 ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS


SEPT. 29, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE MAGISTRATE'S ORDER 


SEPT. 27, 2019 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR DEC. 9, 2019


SEPT. 26, 2019 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE MAGISTRATE'S ORDER OF AUGUST 27, 2019


SEPT. 24, 2019 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


SEPT. 13, 2019, DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 


SEPT. 13, 2019, PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANTS' AUTOMATED PRE-VETTING HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED EXHIBIT A: EMAIL


SEPT 9, 2019 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 11


SEPT. 6, 2019 GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS CORRECT PRIOR MISREPRESENTATION, & BRAG ABOUT ISSUING  VISAS TO ONLY TWO PLAINTIFFS


AUGUST 30, 2019 JUDGE SELNA CONTINUES (RESCHEDULES) HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION TO SEPTEMBER 16, 2019


AUGUST 27, 2019 JUDGE DOUGLAS F. MCCORMICK'S ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


AUGUST 26, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION


AUGUST 22, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY


AUGUST 16, 2019 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION  


AUGUST 16, 2019 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 


AUGUST 14, 2019 CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL (MEMORIALIZING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED PRODUCTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS 


AUGUST 2, 2019 JOSEPH A. DARROW, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ENTERS HIS APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS


JULY 31, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXPEDITED PRODUCTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS, AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT


JULY 29, 2019 ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY PLAINTIFFS JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYMS  


JULY 27, 2019 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT


JULY 23, 2019 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES JUDGES


JULY 22, 2019 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 





IN THE NEWS

JAN. 16, 2020 LEX 18: Lexington family worries about dad left behind in Iran 


AUGUST 13, 2019 COURIER-JOURNAL: This immigrant family hoped to be reunited in Kentucky. Then Trump became president


JULY 25, 2019 LEXINGTON HERALD LEADER: Mom, kids live in Lexington, but her husband is stuck in Iran. She’s suing over travel ban.


JULY 24, 2019 HUFF POST: Group With Family In Iran Latest To Sue Trump Administration Over Travel Ban


JULY 24, 2019 CNN: 14 Iranian American families separated by the travel ban are suing the Trump administration


JULY 23, 2019 شکایت رسمی گروهی از شهروندان ‌آمریکایی و ایرانی 

از ممنوعیت‌های مسافرتی ترامپ


JULY 23, 2019 AP: US citizens and Iranian relatives sue over travel ban

This website is for informational purposes only. Using this site or communicating with Law Office of Curtis Morrison through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.  This site is legal advertising.


  • DV
  • Young v Trump
  • MANDAMUS
  • TRAVEL BAN SECRETS